#PROVUE PANORAMA X DOWNLOAD#

#PROVUE PANORAMA X DOWNLOAD#

Download the procedure and then replace lines 92 to 99, which read: mgKD2 = parameter(5) Unfortunately it incorporates a silly error in the reading of the input parameters but this is easily fixed. ItвЂ™s available on the Panorama Database Exchange site (accessed via the Help menu). Any updates on releasing memory before the end of the tasks?ДЄ few years back I wrote an Accelerated Lookup procedure which theoretically performs a lookup between two databases of any size and essentially has no memory limitations. I see others have raised this issue before, back in Aug, 17. I never once had this occur in Pan 6 under virtually identical scenarios. I attempted to do a lookupselected - about 50% of the records selected in each, and got an вЂњApplication Memory fullвЂќ message showing Panorama using 123 GB! I have two Pan X databases each with ~500,000 records, 39 fields, ~40MB each. Oh, yes, try this out on backup copies before committing to it fully. Replace вЂњMyFieldвЂќ with the field name you need and вЂњSecond DatabaseвЂќ with name of your second database.

The formulafill then eliminates that character before adding the value to the field. Note that I have added a chr(1) character to the values of each record in the field so that we also capture records that are empty in that field. If you have both databases sorted and selected the same way with the same field name used in both databases, this should gather all the values from the first database and transfer their values to the second database replacing anything currently existing in that field let theCommonField='MyField'ДЄrrayselectedbuild fieldValues, cr(), '',chr(1)+ДЇormulafill array(fieldValues,seq(),cr()) Not sure how this would work for you but maybe worth a try. Now, if there were only a way to copy and paste populated fields between Panorama databasesвЂ¦ As far as I know, there is no way for Panorama itself to determine itвЂ™s actual memory usage (IвЂ™ve looked, though I wonвЂ™t 100% guarantee that I just didnвЂ™t find it). So IвЂ™m pretty sure the numbers you see in Activity Monitor are approximations. There are so many allocations, IвЂ™m pretty sure the system is not accurately tracking them for Activity Monitor because that would incur a huge performance penalty, especially if tracked on a second by second basis. Most of these are probably tiny allocations, but they add up (and I think allocating 1 byte may count as a minimum of 1k or maybe even 16k).

Panorama X is almost certainly doing millions of allocations to do your lookups. As I mentioned, Objective-C (and Swift) programs tend to perform thousands or even millions of memory allocations to perform a task. However, all this needs to be taken with a grain of salt. On my system, this value is often quite different than the Memory column, sometimes much smaller, sometimes much larger. I notice that you arenвЂ™t displaying the Real Memory column. This is beyond Safari itself, which is using a half gig.

Activity monitor says that just ONE of those pages is using 1.46 Gb, and another is using 1 Gb. But the memory isnвЂ™t released immediately (obviously, or why allocate it in the first place).ДЇor contrast, right now I have quite a few web pages open in Safari. This is the nature of Objective-C, you canвЂ™t write an Objective-C program that doesnвЂ™t do that. What is actually going into all that RAM - seriously 22 GB?ДЄs Panorama performs a task, it is continuously allocating memory then releasing it.

Provue panorama x